shm_put_var
(PHP 4, PHP 5, PHP 7, PHP 8)
shm_put_var — 共有メモリの変数を挿入または更新する
説明
shm_put_var() は、
指定した key を有する
変数 value の挿入または更新を行います。
shm が有効な SysV 共有メモリではない場合や
リクエストを処理するために充分な共有メモリが残っていない場合は
(E_WARNING レベルの) 警告を発生させます。
パラメータ
shm-
shm_attach() が返す共有メモリセグメント。
key-
変数のキー。
value-
変数。serialize() がサポートするすべての 型を使うことができます。 通常これは、リソース型と一部の内部オブジェクト (シリアライズできないもの) 以外のすべての型を意味します。
変更履歴
| バージョン | 説明 |
|---|---|
| 8.0.0 |
引数 shm は、
SysvSharedMemory クラスのインスタンスを期待するようになりました。
これより前のバージョンでは、リソースが期待されていました。
|
＋add a note
User Contributed Notes 8 notes
Hendrik Klindworth ¶
15 years ago
shm_put_var has no protection against race conditions. If two scripts insert the same key at the same time php might segfault.
jasonrlester at yahoo dot com ¶
16 years ago
sadly troy is right
the following script will return:
resource(5) of type (stream)
int(0)
<?php
define("FOPEN_RESOURCE", 1);
define("FOPEN_FILEPATH", "/path/to/file");
$fopen_resource = fopen(FOPEN_FILEPATH, "w");
var_dump($fopen_resource);
$shm_id = shm_attach(1);
if ($shm_id === false)
{
echo "Fail to attach shared memory.\n";
}
if (!shm_put_var($shm_id, FOPEN_RESOURCE, $fopen_resource))
{
echo "Failed to put var 1 in shared memory $shm_id.\n";
}
$sm_fopen_resource = shm_get_var($shm_id, FOPEN_RESOURCE);
if ($sm_fopen_resource === false)
{
echo "Failed to retreive fopen_resource from Shared memory\r\n";
}
var_dump($sm_fopen_resource);
if($shm_id) shm_remove($shm_id);
if($fopen_resource) fclose($fopen_resource);
?>
troy ¶
16 years ago
This isn't entirely accurate. Not all variable types are supported, you can't put a resource variable into shared memory.
When you try to take it out, it will be a zero.
ygbr at me dot com ¶
15 years ago
Will it ever support resource identifiers like pfsockopen() pointers?
The main problem is that when we run PHP as a Apache Module we never know in which process the next request will bind to, making impossible to have true persistent socket connections unless we can store the pointer to it or directly open the socket inode with fopen() like functions and retrieve the same resource pointer again.
I thought I could use shm, but it seems that shm doesn't allow o store resource pointers... sad... :(
cong818 at gmail dot com ¶
11 years ago
seems to me shm_put_var() doesn't work well with an integer key 0. I changed to 1 and it works like a charm.
orwellophile at spamtrak dot org ¶
14 years ago
Quote: "Will it ever support resource identifiers like pfsockopen() pointers ... we run PHP as a Apache Module ... no way to have true persistent sockets"
Sorry, but that doesn't make sense to me... the socket is still persistent, if you wish to resume it, simply call pfsockopen() with the same host and port - and you will get the same socket. There is no need to pass the actual resource variable.
If there is something amazingly special and unique about each socket, you can do the following - and this should apply to any persistent resource:
To differentiate between or obtain a specific resource - simply serialize/store an index of each resource's unique ID, along with the particulars that make that resource unique.
You can get a unique resource identifier as an integer value like so:
<?php
$rid = str_replace("Resource id #", "", print_r($fp, true));
// $rid = 2
?>
As pfsockopen() uses the hostname and port as a unique key to resume a persistent connection, you can add a DNS wildcard, or a number of manual entries in /etc/hosts (or windows equiv.) as follows:
resource-0.host.com 192.168.100.1
resource-1.host.com 192.168.100.1
resource-2.host.com 192.168.100.1
resource-3.host.com 192.168.100.1
Then, after consulting your serialized list of resources, you can connect to a specific resource by using it's resource id.
eg: $pf = pfsockopen("resource-$rid.host.com", $port, $timeout);
The new resource will be identical to the original in every way.
For file based stream resources you could do something similar with symlinks, or use the next method...
For URL based or other resources with "paths" (I don't know if there *are* persistent functions that involve such things) you could differentiate between them with using extraneous information in the path. eg:
http://host.com/resource-4/../script.php
http://resource4@host.com/script.php
/tmp/././././file.txt
In the first example, the extraneous "resource-4" would be ignored by the webserver.
In the second, the superfluous username would be ignored by the webserver. (Something similar for mysql_pconnect could be done with multiple usernames).
And in the the third example, four sequential occurrences of the "do nothing" string "./" would indicate resource #4.
If this isn't enough, then you can use the fact that PHP shared memory resources are themselves interoperable with those created by their .c counterparts. That allows you to write a thin .c application to handle the dirty work.
Or you could attempt to reconnect to your own webserver, using persistent streams and the methods outlined above, to achieve the end result. I can't think of an example of where something so extreme would be necessary, but I'm sure it's not outside the realm of possibility.
I personally use an 117 MB binary database, which is stored in shared memory, both from the command line (using a complied .c application), and from the web (via PHP, and ftok()/shmop_open()/shmop_read()).
Jason Lester ¶
12 years ago
Yes, it is possible to maintain a real level of resource persistence using shared memory. All vars in PHP are stored in common hashtables as zvals, including resource identifiers. There are hashtables available that outlive the request as long as the entire PHP process isn't shut down. All you need is to store the identifiers in such a hashtable and a way to keep track of them and you can receive the original resource.
I don't know why PHP doesn't provide a way of setting/getting persistent resources, but it is likely do to the many types of SAPI's available for it and the fact that not all of them *can* facilitate this, including CGI which still if far from obsolete.
Another problem is that having such access in userspace is bound to create issues where multiple php processes are trying to access the same resource. Looking at it from this angel you can see that there's really no safe way to safely use such getter/setters without a better synchronism scheme in PHP.
tomlove at gmail dot com ¶
20 years ago
Use as few variable_keys as you can. With large arrays of data, rather make the array multi-dimensional and store under one variable_key than use variable_key as your index. The benefit is especially noticeable when repeated fetching from the end of the array is necessary and updates are less frequent.
↑ and ↓ to navigate •
Enter to select •
Esc to close
Press Enter without
selection to search using Google